论抵押权人与债权人分离情形下的抵押权设定及其实现——以《最高人民法院关于适用〈民法典〉有关担保制度的解释》第4条为中心  

Establishment and Realization of Mortgage Rights with the Separation of Mortgagee and Creditor:on Article 4 of“Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Applying the Guarantee System of the Civil Code”

作　　者：李昊 刘磊 LI Hao;LIU Lei(School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan,430073;College of Comparative Law,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing,100088)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院 [2]中国政法大学比较法学研究院

出　　处：《云南社会科学》2022年第5期26-38,共13页Social Sciences in Yunnan

摘　　要：在抵押权人与债权人分离情形下,尽管出现了抵押登记名实不符的现象,但考虑到这种分离并未损伤抵押登记的制度功能,以隐名代理制度进行解释并认可此种情形下的抵押权设定效力,在解释论上仍具有较强的现实可行性。根据民事代理与诉讼代理的区别以及诉讼担当理论的严格要求,原则上仅债权人可作为适格原告,只有在债券发行中抵押权人与债权人分离的情况下,才应例外地承认受托人可以作为适格原告。With the separation of the mortgagee and the creditor,there is a phenomenon that the mortgage registration is not in accordance with the reality.Considering that the separation does not impair the function of the mortgage registration,it is still highly feasible to interpret and recognize the validity of mortgage establishment by undisclosed agency.According to the differentiation between civil agency and litigation agency and the strict requirements of litigation undertaking theory,only the creditor can be a qualified plaintiff in principle.Exceptional recognition of a trustee as a qualifying plaintiff only exists in the case of issuing bonds when the mortgagee is separated from the creditor.

关 键 词：抵押权人与债权人分离 抵押登记 隐名代理 诉讼代理 诉讼担当 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]