论法人责任归属规则——《民法典》第62条第1款的解释论重构  

On the Attribution Rule of Legal Person's Liability:Interpretative Reconstruction of Article 62,Paragraph 1 of the Civil Code

作　　者：孙新宽 SUN Xin-kuan(Law School,Beijing Normal University,Beijing,100875)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院

出　　处：《云南社会科学》2022年第5期39-47,共9页Social Sciences in Yunnan

基　　金：“中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金”(项目号:2021NTSS59)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：《中华人民共和国民法典》(以下简称《民法典》)第62条第1款与法人本质理论无关,其性质为法人责任归属规则,作用在于将法定代表人因执行职务产生的民事责任归属于法人。该款必须结合具体的请求权基础规范才能适用,其适用范围不限于侵权损害赔偿责任,也可以适用于违约损害赔偿责任和缔约过失损害赔偿责任。但在《民法典》的规范体系下,该款仅在缔约过失损害赔偿责任的适用上具有独立价值。法定代表人越权代表行为对第三人引起的缔约过失或侵权赔偿责任,也有可能适用《民法典》第62条第1款归属于法人承担。Article 62,Paragraph 1 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China(the Civil Code)is not about the nature of the legal representative but about the attribution rule of legal representative's liability,whose function is to attribute the civil liability from performing duties by the legal representative to the legal person.The Paragraph can only be applied in combination with the specific basic norms of claim rights,and its scope of application is not limited to tort damage liability,but can also be applied to breach of contract damage liability and culpa in contrahendo liability.But this provision only has independent value in the application of culpa in contrahendo under the system of the Civil Code.If a legal representative acts without authorization and causes damage to a third person through culpa in contrahendo or tort,the damage may also be attributed to the legal person in accordance with Article 62,Paragraph 1 of the Civil Code.

关 键 词：责任归属规则 法定代表人 法人本质理论 缔约过失责任 越权代表 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]