“双战构造”中两岸媒体的记忆政治——以“二二八事件”为中心的考察  

The Memory Politics of Cross-strait Media in the“Double War Structure”——An Exploration of the February 28 Incident

作　　者：向芬[1,2] XIANG Fen(School of Journalism and Communication,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102401;Institute of Journalism and Communication,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100021,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学新闻传播学院,北京102401 [2]中国社会科学院新闻与传播研究所,北京100021

出　　处：《江西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第4期127-137,共11页Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：全国宣传思想文化青年英才资助项目([2020]118号)。

摘　　要：对“二二八事件”历史话语解释权的把握,需要在长时段中进行比较历史研究,采用内战和冷战的“双战构造”框架来分析两岸“二二八事件”的媒体话语特征及变迁轨迹,进而审视在不同历史时期的记忆政治。研究发现,两岸媒体的报道和话语转化所形成的媒体记忆是被政治化的,在各据一方的意识形态和现实政治需求之中,报道的主题和叙事折射出两岸主导价值的差异以及记忆政治的延续与变化。两岸和平与发展最终取决于能否形成新的共识,未来需要着重讨论两岸分别发展的不同政治话语将如何被整合,并从中找寻更具兼容性的思想资源。To grasp the power of historical discourse interpretation of“the February 28 Incident”,we need to conduct a comparative historical study in a long period of time.The“doublewar structure”framework of the civil war and the cold war is used to analyze the characteristics and trajectory of media discourse of“the February 28 Incident”on both sides of the Taiwan Straits,and then examine the politics of memory in different historical periods.It is found that the media memory formed by the media reports and discourse transformation of both sides is politicized.In the ideological and realpolitical needs demands of each side,the theme and narrative of the report reflect the difference of the dominant values of both sides and the continuation and change of the politics of memory.Peace and development between the two sides ultimately depends on whether a new consensus can be formed.In the future,we should focus on how to integrate the different political discourses developed by the two sides,and find more compatible ideological resources from them.

关 键 词：二二八事件 两岸媒体 双战构造 记忆政治 

分 类 号：G206[文化科学—传播学]