检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周少来[1,2] Zhou Shaolai
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院大学政府管理学院 [2]中国社会科学院政治学研究所
出 处:《国家治理》2022年第16期44-48,共5页Governance
摘 要:依规精准问责,是基层治理中传导责任压力的制度方式。但“问责泛化”则会导致出乎制度预期的种种负效应,甚至成为阻滞基层治理现代化的负向激励。基层治理中“问责泛化”现象,非一时一地所为,也并非个别干部所致,有其深刻的制度性体制根源。从根本上遏制基层“问责泛化”要通过制度化的体制机制改革,减轻层层传导的体制压力,明确县—乡镇政府之间的权力和责任,增强基层乡镇的自主权力和空间,拓宽基层民众的民主参与和监督,切实加快推进基层治理现代化。Targeted accountability in accordance with regulations is an institutional method to transmit the pressure of responsibility to the local governance.However,“overstretched accountability”can lead to negative effects beyond the expectations of the institution in question,and even become a negative incentive to stall the modernization of the local governance.The phenomenon of“overstretched accountability”in the local governance is neither the result of one moment or one place,nor is it the consequences brought by individual officials.It has its own deep institutional roots.To fundamentally curb the“overstretching of accountability”at the local level,it requests institutionalized reform of the mechanism,reduction of the institutional pressure transmitted through different levels,clearly defined power and responsibilities between county and township governments,broadening of township rights and space of self-determination,the locals’growing democratic participation and supervision,and accelerated promotion of the modernization of the local governance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.37.17