“分别”句的歧义问题及相关表意控制条件  

The Ambiguity and Relevant Meaning-expression Controlling Factors of “Fenbie-construction”

作　　者：宋怡琳 岳立静[1] SONG Yilin;YUE Lijing

机构地区：[1]山东大学文学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《济南大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第5期37-45,173,174,共11页Journal of University of Jinan:Social Science Edition

基　　金：教育部、国家语委中国语言资源保护工程专项任务“山东农村传统农业词汇调查与数据库建设”(项目编号:YB2003C005B);山东大学文学院重大项目“山东方言自然话语口语语料库的建设及应用”之阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：造成“分别”句存在歧义问题的根本原因是分配算子“分别”的灵活性。但“分别”句句式和语义管控条件可以限制分配算子“分别”的灵活性,从而造成不同句式“分别”句有无歧义情况的不同和同类句式不同歧义实例歧义指数的差异。两个主体对应两个对象时,只要有一个主体对对象具有不可兼有性或一个对象对主体具有不可兼有性,句子就没有歧义。反之则有歧义,句子的歧义指数与主体与主体、对象与对象间时间顺序是否明确以及这种不明确的关系在句子情景中是否会对句子的意义产生影响有关。多个主体对应多个对象时,主体和对象只有形成至少一个双向的不可兼有性,句子才不会产生歧义。The root cause of the ambiguity of “Fenbie-construction” is the flexibility of the distributive operator “Fenbie”. However, the sentence pattern and deep semantic controlling factors of “Fenbie-construction” can limit the flexibility of “Fenbie”, thus causing some sentences to be ambiguous and some not. It also leads to the difference in the number of ambiguities of the same sentence pattern. When two subjects correspond to two objects, as long as there is a one-way non-facultative between subjects and objects, the sentence will not have the ambiguity. Otherwise, there is the ambiguity. In this case, the number of ambiguities is related to whether the time sequence between subjects and subjects, objects and objects is clear, and whether the ambiguous relationship will affect the meaning of the sentence in its context. When multiple subjects correspond to multiple objects, there is no ambiguity only when at least one bidirectional non-facultative is formed.

关 键 词：“分别” 歧义 分配算子 不可兼有性 表意控制条件 

分 类 号：H146[语言文字—汉语]