新世纪以来中日辞赋研究状况的差异——基于学术著作的视角  

Differences of Chinese and Japanese Researches on Ci and Fu Since the Beginning of the 21st Century from the Perspective of Academic Works

作　　者：栗山雅央 KURIYAMA Masahiro

机构地区：[1]中国矿业大学人文与艺术学院,江苏徐州221116

出　　处：《济南大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第5期52-61,174,共11页Journal of University of Jinan:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：在研究辞赋方面,目前中日学术界存在着很多不同,特别是如下两点:第一是研究对象。日本的辞赋研究对象集中在六朝以前,而在中国,对六朝以前和唐宋以后辞赋的研究却都很丰富,而且最近还开始了朝鲜,越南等域外辞赋的研究。第二是辞赋研究者的人数。虽然最近研究中国文学的日本年轻学者较多,但是辞赋研究者并不多。在中国,自马积高《赋史》以来,有不计其数的研究者都继承了辞赋研究的传统而进一步展开自己的研究。通过“通史”与“断代”、“广泛”与“狭小”、“辞”与“赋”、“整理”与“未整理”等几个视角来考察新世纪辞赋研究的状况,进而分析中日之间对辞赋研究的差异。通过这些比较,我们能够更好地理解两国辞赋研究的特征。At present, there are many differences in the researches on Ci and Fu in the Chinese and Japanese academia. First, the subject of research. Most Japanese researches on Ci and Fu are concentrated on those before the Six Dynasties. However, in China, there are numerous researches on Ci and Fu before the Six Dynasties and after the Tang and the Song Dynasties. Second, the number of researchers. There are not many researchers of Ci and Fu in Japan, though there are comparatively many young Japanese scholars studying Chinese literature recently. In contrast, since the History of Fu by Ma Jigao, countless Chinese researchers have inherited the tradition of studying Ci and Fu and carried out their own further studies. Through the perspectives of "general history" and "periodization", "extensiveness" and "narrowness", "Ci" and "Fu", "organized" and "unorganized", this article investigates researches on Ci and Fu in the new century, and on this basis, analyzes the differences between Chinese and Japanese researches on Ci and Fu. Through such comparisons, we expect to better understand the characteristics of Chinese and Japanese researches on Ci and Fu.

关 键 词：中国 日本 辞赋研究 二十一世纪 域外 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]