检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李冬灵[1] 何慕涵[1] 崔宗义 张果[1] LI Dongling;HE Muhan;CUI Zongyi;ZHANG Guo(Interventional Operation Room,Zhengzhou 7^(th)People's Hospital,Zhengzhou 450016,China)
机构地区:[1]郑州市第七人民医院介入手术室,河南郑州450016
出 处:《临床医学工程》2022年第9期1285-1286,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering
基 金:河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目(LHGJ20190440)。
摘 要:目的探讨治疗性沟通护理模式对肝癌介入治疗患者应对方式及疾病接受度的影响。方法选取2020年1月至2021年12月我院收治的120例接受介入治疗的肝癌患者,随机分为观察组(治疗性沟通护理模式)与对照组(常规护理)各60例。比较两组的应对方式及疾病接受度。结果干预后,观察组面对评分高于对照组,回避、屈服、幻想、发泄评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。干预后,观察组疾病接受程度高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论治疗性沟通护理模式可优化肝癌介入治疗患者对疾病的应对方式,提高其疾病接受度。Objective To explore the impact of therapeutic communication nursing model on coping style and disease acceptance of patients with liver cancer interventional therapy.Methods 120 patients with liver cancer interventional therapy in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 were selected and randomly divided into observation group(therapeutic communication nursing model)and control group(routine nursing),with 60 cases in each group.The coping style and disease acceptance were compared between the two groups.Results After intervention,the face score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group,and the avoidance,submission,fantasy and venting scores were lower than those of the control group(P<0.05).After intervention,the disease acceptance of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusions Therapeutic communication nursing model can optimize the coping style of patients with liver cancer interventional therapy,and improve their disease acceptance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15