检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈娟[1] 蒋进广[1] CHEN Juan;JIANG Jin-guang(Coloproctological Dept.,Suqian City’s Hospital of TCM,Suqian,Jiangsu 223800)
出 处:《中国肛肠病杂志》2022年第7期21-22,共2页Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
摘 要:目的:观察痔上黏膜柱状缝扎加改良皮桥切除缝合内痔结扎术治疗重度脱垂痔的疗效。方法:将50例重度脱垂痔患者分为观察组22例和对照组28例。观察组患者采用痔上黏膜柱状缝扎加改良皮桥切除缝合内痔结扎术治疗,对照组患者采用外剥内扎术治疗,比较2组患者的疗效、术后出血及疼痛评分。结果:2组患者治疗总有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患者术后Ⅰ级出血13例(59.09%),Ⅱ级出血9例(40.91%);对照组患者术后Ⅰ级出血7例(25.00%),Ⅱ级出血14例(50.00%),Ⅲ级出血7例(25.00%);2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者治疗3、7、14d的疼痛评分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:痔上黏膜柱状缝扎加改良皮桥切除缝合内痔结扎术治疗重度脱垂痔具有出血少、疼痛轻、恢复快等优点。Objective To observe the effect of columnar ligature&suture for prolapse and hemorrhoids(CLSPH)plus modified resection&suture for skin tag and ligature of inner hemorrhoids(modified RSST and LIH).Methods Enrolled and divided 50patients with severe prolapsed hemorrhoids treated in author’s hospital(2018-02-2021-06)into observation group(22cases,received above CLSPH plus modified RSST and LIH)and control group(28cases,external dissection&internal ligature);then,compared both groups’effect,postoperative bleeding status,and the score ratings on pain.Results In postoperative bleeding status there was statistical difference between observation group and control group[Ⅰgrade:in13cases(59.09%)vs in 7(25.00%),Ⅱgrade:in 9cases(40.91%)vs in 14(50.00%),and,Ⅲgrade:0vs in 7(25.00%),thus,P<0.05];in total effective rate there was no statistical difference between the two groups(P>0.05);As for the ratings on pain at 3,7and 14days after treatment observation group was lower than control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The combined procedure used in observation group for severe prolapsed hemorrhoids has such merits as less bleeding,slighter pain,and faster recovery.
关 键 词:重度脱垂痔 痔上黏膜柱状缝扎术 改良皮桥切除缝合内痔结扎术
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145