满汉涵化视野下的清代宫刑  

On the Qing dynasty castration punishment under the perspective of cultural integration of Manchu and Han

作　　者：李毅婷 LI Yiting(Institute of China’s Borderland,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua 321004,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江师范大学边疆研究院,浙江金华321004

出　　处：《浙江师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第5期58-67,共10页Journal of Zhejiang Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大招标项目“中国疆域最终奠定的路径与模式研究”(15ZDB028)。

摘　　要：出于绝人子嗣者应绝嗣的同态复仇理念,乾隆帝正式恢复宫刑。除了宫刑外,清代还长期存在着三种肉刑:刺字、割脚筋、贯耳鼻。宫刑等肉刑在清代的恢复甚至大规模使用,一方面是入关前法律文化的延伸,另一方面则是由于传统立嗣观发展至顶点,恢复肉刑的舆论阻力极小。无论是满族原有的割脚筋、贯耳鼻,还是中原王朝固有的刺字、宫刑,在清朝的实行沿革中,都存在满汉文化相互涵化的现象。Out of the concept of homomorphic revenge that someone who kills all the descendants of another person should be treated as well, Emperor Qianlong officially resumed castration punishment. In addition to castration punishment, there were also three kinds of corporal punishment for a long time in the Qing dynasty-tattooing, cutting hamstring, and piercing ears and nose with iron chain. Corporal punishment like castration punishment was restored and even used on a large scale in the Qing dynasty, which was due to not only the extension of Manchu’s legal culture but also the development of the traditional concept of inheritance. The public voice against restoring corporal punishment was also extremely low. In the evolution of the Qing dynasty, there were phenomena of mutual integration of Manchu and Han cultures between the original Manchu punishments such as cutting hamstrings and piercing ears or noses and the inherent tattooing and castration punishment of the Central Plains Dynasties.

关 键 词：清代 宫刑 肉刑 满汉互化 杀一家三人 

分 类 号：K249[历史地理—历史学]