检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘伟 顾鑫 LIU Wei;GU Xin(Wuhu Vocational and Technical College,Wuhu Anhui 241002,China)
出 处:《北方水稻》2022年第4期33-35,64,共4页North Rice
基 金:芜湖职业技术学院校级项目“主要经济作物优质高产与提质增效研究团队”Wzykytd202201。
摘 要:为探索药肥一体化技术,设常规肥药加助剂、减肥药增助剂、常规肥药不加助剂三个处理,比较研究不同处理对水稻稻瘟病和纹枯病及产量的影响。结果表明:常规肥药加助剂处理对水稻稻瘟病和纹枯病的防效最高,其次是减肥药增助剂处理,常规肥药不加助剂处理防效最差,与减肥药增助剂处理达到差异显著水平。三个处理水稻千粒重、穗长、穗实粒数、有效穗数都明显高于清水对照,产量增加3.96%~13.81%,表现出较好的增产效果。In order to explore the integrated technology of fungicide and fertilizer, the effects of different treatments on rice blast, sheath blight and yield were compared and studied by adding conventional fertilizer and additives, reducing fertilizer and additives, and conventional fertilizer and additives without additives. The results showed that the control effect of conventional fertilizer and adjuvant on rice blast and sheath blight was the highest, followed by the treatment of reducing fertilizer, and the control effect of the treatment without adjuvant was the worst, which was significantly different from that of the treatment with reducing fertilizer. The 1000-grain weight, panicle length, grain number per panicle, and effective panicle number of the three treatments were significantly higher than those of the water control, and the yield increased by 3.96%-13.81%, and had a good control effect on yield.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.237.30