检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李伊晴 Li Yiqing
机构地区:[1]北京大学艺术学院
出 处:《美术》2022年第9期93-103,共11页Art Magazine
摘 要:自20世纪中期以来,英语世界里的学者以不同角度构建了20世纪早期的中国现代艺术史。本文梳理了其中三种主要的叙事模式,即中西二元架构下的中国现代艺术之被动性,解构二元论后的中国现代艺术之主体性和多元性,艺术与都市消费弥合中的中国现代艺术之大众性。本文通过分析这三种叙事模式的语境和演变过程,以探讨西方学者认知中国现代艺术的方式的突破,并借此思考新一代艺术史学者构建中国现代艺术史的责任。From the mid-twentieth century to the present, scholars in the English-language world have established histories of modern Chinese arts from different perspectives. This paper explores the three major types of art histories, including the passiveness of modern Chinese arts in the East-West dualist framework, the autonomy and diversity of modern Chinese arts in a new structure that deconstructs the dualistic mode, and the popularity of modern Chinese arts in a framework based on the merge of art and urban consumption. In analyzing the evolution of these three narrative modes, this paper seeks to point out and contextualize the changing ways that English scholars understand modern Chinese art, which can be used to think of potential responsibilities that the new generation of art historians should take to construct Chinese art histories.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.127.79