智慧时代司法发展的技术动力、价值基础和价值机理  

Technological dynamics, value basis and value mechanism of judicial development in the era of wisdom

作　　者：季金华[1] JI Jin-hua(School of Law,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《中国海商法研究》2022年第3期65-76,共12页Chinese Journal of Maritime Law

基　　金：2019年度江苏省社科基金重点项目“社会主义核心价值的司法维护机制研究”(19FXA001)。

摘　　要：网络社会时代、大数据时代、人工智能时代构成了智慧时代。大数据的应用使得进一步实现司法裁判标准统一和结果透明、优化案件和法官的双向分配、提升法官体系思维和法律推理能力等成为了可能,进而促进了司法的公正、高效、权威。智慧时代赋予了自由、安全、公正等传统价值以全新意蕴和显著意义,成为新时代司法发展的重要价值基础。智慧经济的创新需求和新领域事实上的自我管理决定了保障自由的必要,技术造成的犯罪便利、隐私泄露、科技产品缺陷等风险呼唤更高安全保障,而其中显现的权利冲突与利益失衡、歧视加剧则期待司法更有效地捍卫正义。智慧时代的立法速度与社会革新速度的矛盾突出,频发的新颖复杂案件要求司法裁判必须以价值判断填补规则空白以维护司法的基础性价值。法院应该深刻地意识到,消解人民意志的矛盾应该坚持保护同等自由的价值选择标准、化解权利冲突需要遵守利益平衡的价值选择原则、缓解规范与事实的张力需要遵循社会正义优先的价值选择准则。The era of network society, the era of big data and the era of artificial intelligence constitute the era of wisdom. The application of big data makes it possible to further realize unified standards and transparent results of judicial adjudication, optimize the two-way distribution of cases and judges, and enhance judges’ systemic thinking and legal reasoning ability, which in turn promote justice, efficiency and authority of justice. The era of wisdom has given the traditional values of freedom, security and justice new meanings and significances, and has become the important value basis for judicial development in the new era. The innovative needs of the wisdom economy and the de facto self-management of new fields determine the need to respect and safeguard freedom, and the risks caused by technology, such as the facilitation of crime, privacy leakage and defects in technological products, call for higher security, while the conflict and imbalance of rights and the intensification of discrimination that have emerged expect the justice system to defend justice. The contradiction between the speed of legislation and the speed of social innovation in the era of wisdom is prominent, and the frequent occurrence of new and complex cases requires judicial decisions to fill in the rule gaps with value judgments to maintain the fundamental value of justice. The court should be deeply aware that dissolving the contradiction of people’s will should adhere to the value selection standard of protecting equal freedom, resolving the conflict of rights needs to comply with the value selection principle of balance of interests, and alleviating the tension between norms and facts needs to follow the value selection basis of prioritizing social justice.

关 键 词：智慧时代 司法发展 价值基础 价值机理 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]