检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:ZHANG Chuchu
机构地区:[1]Department of Politics and International Studies,University of Cambridge
出 处:《Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies》2016年第4期66-85,共20页亚洲中东与伊斯兰研究(英文)
摘 要:This article seeks to explain the differing counter-terrorist effects in Algeria and Yemen over the past two decades.While terrorism peaked in both countries in the late 1990s and incumbents in both countries responded with“carrot and stick”strategies,the results have been entirely different,with Yemen mired in deeper violence,whereas domestic terrorist forces were almost wiped out in Algeria in the late 2000s.To account for this variance and to measure the effects of the“carrot and stick”approach,the article adopts the state capacity model by analyzing how Bouteflika centralized Algeria’s bureaucracy and administration since 1999 which facilitated the communication between the intelligence,military and judiciary,thus strengthening military operations and law enforcement,and how Saleh’s Yemen filled with separatism and sectarianism aggravated the regime’s deficiencies of information collection and revenue concentration,leading to the continuation of terrorism.Evidence from my framework and cases suggest that coping with terrorist violence requires much more thoroughgoing measures than military blows;legislative efforts and national dialogues.The study is not limited to the cases of Algeria and Yemen,but aims at shedding light on more countries confronted with terrorist threat.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.180.18