检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李辰智 王梦瑶 杨芳绒[1] LI Chenzhi;WANG Mengyao;YANG Fangrong(College of Landscape Architecture and Art,Henan Agricultural University,Zhengzhou 450002,China;Zhuhai College of Science and Technology,Zhuhai,Guangdong 519041,China)
机构地区:[1]河南农业大学风景园林与艺术学院,河南郑州450002 [2]珠海科技学院,广东珠海519041
出 处:《林业调查规划》2022年第5期116-121,126,共7页Forest Inventory and Planning
基 金:河南省科技智库立项(HNKJZK-2020-01C).
摘 要:依据场动力理论和实地调研情况,构建包含5个一级指标和29个二级指标因子的城市公园游憩体验满意度评价模型,并以西安市樊川公园为例进行评价分析。采用SPSS统计分析软件对198份调查问卷的变量数据进行因子分析,以此验证评价模型的科学性。采用变异系数法确定各个指标的权重,通过模糊综合评价法评判指标得分。结果表明,公园总体满意度为2.01,满意度水平介于一般至满意之间,且偏向于满意,5个一级指标的游憩满意度从高到低为:自然环境刺激>自我提升>基本需求>人文景观刺激>匮缺补偿。Based on field dynamics theory and field investigations,this paper constructed an evaluation model of urban park recreation satisfaction that included 5 first-level indicators and 29 second-level indicators,and Fanchuan Park in Xi′an was taken as an example for evaluation and analysis.SPSS statistical analysis software was used to conduct factor analysis on the variable data of 198 questionnaires to verify the scientificity of the evaluation model.The weight of each index was determined by the coefficient of variation method,and the index score was evaluated by the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method.The results showed that the overall satisfaction level of the park was 2.01,which was between average and satisfaction,and was inclined to satisfaction.The recreation satisfaction of 5 first-level indicators from high to low were natural environment stimulation>self-improvement>basic needs>cultural landscape stimulation>compensation of deficiency.
关 键 词:城市公园 游憩满意度 模糊综合评价法 场动力理论 西安市樊川公园
分 类 号:TU986.51[建筑科学—城市规划与设计] N945.16[自然科学总论—系统科学] O159[理学—数学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.81