论电子商务合同格式条款的法律配置:问题、进路与方法  

Legal Allocation of Standard Terms of E-commerce Contracts:Problems,Approaches and Methods

作　　者：吴双 WU Shuang(School of Law,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China;School of Law,Shanghai University of International Business and Economics,Shanghai 201620,China)

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084 [2]上海对外经贸大学法学院,上海201620

出　　处：《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第5期96-103,128,共9页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大资助项目(18ZDA149)。

摘　　要：《民法典》未对电子商务合同格式条款给予足够回应,未来仍需依靠《电子商务法》对其提供充分的法律供给。电子商务格式条款的同质化趋势、网络环境下加剧的信息不对称、商事创新的脱法性、电商对用户心理的滥用,给传统格式条款规制模式带来新的挑战。民法调整电子商务格式条款需要把握“公平原则”的一般法律精神,平衡交易双方地位,以订入控制、内容控制实现缔约过程和缔约结果的公平。《电子商务法》应本着“比例原则”建立电商评级制度,增设异常条款排除规则,细化网络环境下电子商务合同说明、提示义务的履行方式,并设置负面清单以实现对电子商务格式条款的法律配置。The Civil Code of China does not give sufficient response to the standard terms of e-commerce contracts,and The E-commerce Law is supposed to provide sufficient legal supply in the future.The homogenization trend of e-commerce standard terms,the aggravation of information asymmetry in the network environment,the lawlessness of commercial innovation and the abuse of e-commerce on users psychology have brought new challenges to the regulation mode of traditional standard terms.To adjust the standard terms of e-commerce in the civil law,the general legal spirit of the“principle of fairness”should be grasped,the status of both parties to the transaction should be balanced,and the fairness of the contracting process and result should be realized by setting in control and content control.The E-commerce Law should establish the e-commerce rating system based on the“principle of proportion”,add the exclusion rules of abnormal terms,refine the performance methods of e-commerce contract description and prompt the obligations in the network environment,and set up a negative list to realize the legal allocation of e-commerce standard terms.

关 键 词：电子商务合同 格式条款 公平原则 《民法典》 《电子商务法》 

分 类 号：D912.29[政治法律—民商法学]