新购大型科研仪器查重评议相关机制研究  

Study on relevant mechanism of duplicate checking review of newly purchase large-scale scientific research instruments

作　　者：徐振国[1] 王荣荣[2] 郭振玺 江永亨[4] 韩玉刚[5] 王晋[1] XU Zhenguo;WANG Rongrong;GUO Zhenxi;JIANG Yongheng;HAN YUgang;WANG Jin(National Science and Technology Infrastructure Center,Beijing 100038,China;Institute of Zoology,Chinese Academy Sciences,Beijing 100101,China;School of Life Science,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China;Office of Laboratory Management,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China;The Core Facilities of Protein Sciences,Institute of Biophysics,Chinese Academy Sciences,Beijing100101,China)

机构地区：[1]国家科技基础条件平台中心,北京100038 [2]中国科学院动物研究所,北京100101 [3]北京大学生命学院,北京100871 [4]清华大学实验室管理处,北京100084 [5]中国科学院生物物理研究所蛋白质科学研究平台,北京100101

出　　处：《实验技术与管理》2022年第9期261-265,共5页Experimental Technology and Management

基　　金：国家科技基础条件平台专项课题(2019DDJ1ZZ10)。

摘　　要：查重评议是促进大型科研仪器开放共享、布局优化,减少重复购置、提高财政资金使用效率的有效方法。该文从建立数据库、确立查重评议方法、形成评议流程、跟踪分析结果等方面详细阐释查重评议体系的建设要点,并进一步分析体系中仪器命名规范性、基础数据完整性、预警机制、饱满工作机时等4个核心要素的作用,最后从具体操作层面和制度机制层面提出改进措施建议。Duplicate checking review is an effective means to promoting opening and sharing, optimizing the layout and reducing the repeated purchase of large-scale scientific research instruments, as well as improving the effective use of financial funds. In this paper, the key points of the construction of the duplicate checking review system are explained in detail from setting up a database, defining methods, developing the review process, and tracking analysis results. The four core elements of this system, including instrument nomenclature, data integrity,early warning mechanism and service time, are further analyzed in details. Finally, suggestions for improvement are put forward from the specific operation level and institutional mechanism level.

关 键 词：大型科研仪器 查重评议 开放共享 政策建议 

分 类 号：G311[文化科学]