中国现代文学史的新文学本位论与新创诗词的入史困境  

On the Ontology of New Literature in Modern Chinese Literary History and the Predicament for Newly-Created Poetry to Be Listed in History

作　　者：方维保[1] FANG Wei-bao(School of Liberal Arts,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241002,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学文学院,安徽芜湖241002

出　　处：《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第5期83-89,共7页Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“百年中国新文学史编纂体例研究”(20BZW148)。

摘　　要：新创诗词在近百年来一直体例性缺席中国新文学史的叙述,究其原因在于新文学在与旧文学争正统的过程中所形成的新文学本位意识。新创诗词在现代时期编纂的新文学史叙述中比较少见,虽然在20世纪80年代以来编纂的新文学史、现代文学史、当代文学史中出现的频率比较高,但大多以非常规的方式出现,且没有形成新文学史叙述的惯例,更没有呈现于叙史体例之中。新创诗词“入史”问题的解决,应该是在作为历史命名的“现代”和“当代”范畴之内,而不是在“新文学”的旗帜之下。新文学史草创时期的新旧文学对立的意识形态已经消泯,为文学史叙述回归常态创造了条件。但新创诗词批评和研究的滞后,又给入史带来了新的困难。In the past hundred years,newly created old style poems have been systematical absent from the history of Chinese New-Literature.The reason lies in the new-literature ontology formed in the process of fighting for orthodoxy with old literature.Newly created old style poems are rare in the history of new-literature compiled in modern periods but made frequent appearance in literary history compiled from the 1980s,yet most appeared in the narration of literary history in unconventional ways absent from style lists.The solution to the problem of“entering history”should be within the scope of“modern”and“contemporary”,rather than under the banner of“new-literature”.The disappearing opposing ideology has created conditions for the return literary history narration to the normal.However,the delay in the criticism and research of newly created old style poems has brought new difficulties.

关 键 词：新创诗词 新文学本位 体例性缺席 文学史 

分 类 号：I207.25[文学—中国文学]