检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜爱 姚娜[1] 李兆燕[1] 谢娟 Jiang Ai;Yao Na;Li Zhao-yan;Xie Juan(Department of Neonatology,Kunming First People's Hospital,Kunming 650011,Yunnan Province,China)
机构地区:[1]昆明市第一人民医院新生儿科,云南昆明650011
出 处:《中国社区医师》2022年第26期109-111,共3页Chinese Community Doctors
摘 要:目的:探讨早产儿健康教育模式对家属认知水平及早产儿生活质量的影响。方法:选取2021年5月-2022年2月昆明市第一人民医院新生儿重症监护病房收治的100例早产儿作为研究对象,随机分为研究组和对照组,各50例。对照组予以常规护理,研究组给予早产儿健康教育模式。比较两组早产儿照护者育儿认知水平,早产儿出院时、出院3个月后生活质量评分,早产儿生长、智能发育情况。结果:研究组日常照护相关知识与技能、疾病防护相关知识与技能、康复相关知识与技能、社会服务相关知识评分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。出院时,两组生活质量评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);出院3个月后,研究组生活质量评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组精细运动、适应能力、大运动、社交行为及语言评分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:构建系统化早产儿健康教育模式有利于提升家属认知水平,提高早产儿生活质量,对提高喂养质量、改善生长发育水平均具有积极意义,建议应用并予以推广。Objective: To explore the influence of the health education model of premature infants on the cognitive level of family members and the quality of life of premature infants. Methods: A total of 100 premature infants admitted to the Department of Neonatology of Kunming First People’s Hospital from May 2021 to February 2022 were selected as the research subjects. They were randomly divided into study group and control group, 50 cases in each. The control group was given routine nursing care,while the study group was given the health education model for premature infants. The caregivers of preterm infants on parenting cognition level, quality of life scores at the time of discharge and 3 months after discharge, and the growth and intelligence development of preterm infants were compared between the two groups. Results: The scores of daily care-related knowledge and skills, disease prevention-related knowledge and skills, rehabilitation-related knowledge and skills, and social service-related knowledge scores in the study group were higher than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). At discharge, there was no significant difference in the quality of life scores between the two groups(P>0.05). Three months after discharge, the quality of life score of the study group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The scores of fine motor, adaptability, gross motor, social behavior and language in the study group were higher than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion: The establishment of a systematic health education model for premature infants is conducive to improving the cognitive level of family members and improving the quality of life of premature infants, which has positive significance for improving feeding quality and growth and development level, and it is recommended to apply and promote it.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30