中美规范荷载效应组合对比研究  

Comparison of Load Combinations Between China and the United States Standard

作　　者：李翔 高玲 陈健陵 LI Xiang;GAO Ling;CHEN Jianling(Clean Combustion and Flue Gas Purification Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province,611731,Chengdu,China;Dongfang Boiler Group Co.,Ltd.,643001,ZiGong,Sichuan,China)

机构地区：[1]清洁燃烧与烟气净化四川省重点实验室,成都611731 [2]东方电气集团东方锅炉股份有限公司,四川自贡643001

出　　处：《东方电气评论》2022年第3期80-84,共5页Dongfang Electric Review

摘　　要：对比中国标准GB 50068-2018建筑结构可靠性设计统一标准、GB50011-2010(2016年版)建筑抗震设计规范与美国标准ASCE7-16 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures中关于荷载组合的异同,为设计人员采用不同规范进行结构设计时就荷载组合方面提供参考与帮助。The similarities and differences in load combinations are compared on the Chinese standards GB 50068-2018,"Unified Standard for the Reliability Design of Building Structures"and GB50011-2010,"Seismic design code for buildings"(2016 edition)and the American standard ASCE7-16,"Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures".This paper presents helpful references for designers to use different specifications for structural design on the load combination.

关 键 词：中国标准 美国标准 荷载组合 

分 类 号：TU202[建筑科学—建筑设计及理论]