检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:江河[1,2] Jiang He
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学法学院 [2]中南财经政法大学国际法治与国家安全研究所
出 处:《南大法学》2022年第5期1-15,共15页NanJing University Law Journal
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大专项项目“坚持统筹推进国内法治和涉外法治研究”(项目编号:2022JZDZ005)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:在全球化时代,和平与发展成为国际社会的主流,对外维护国家安全和增强以经济为基础的综合实力成为国家主权外在强化的两种路径。WTO的自由贸易哲学和国际市场的“复合相互依赖”促进了国家之间的消极和平,“同类产品”的非歧视待遇使各国通过WTO强化了其国家主权。然而,跨国经济活动也造成了全球公共危机,任何国家都无力独自追求其自身安全。西方新自由主义外交实践导致的发展问题使大部分发展中国家在经济上日益边缘化,这又削弱了发展中国家的国家主权。在国际民粹主义兴起的背景下,国家主权强化的这种法理悖论导致了WTO争端解决机制上诉机构的瘫痪和普惠制的名存实亡。中国提出的人类命运共同体理念有利于推动大国政治和国际法治的互动,通过主权国家的实质平等来解决WTO的制度危机。In times of globalization,peace and development turn out to be the two major trends of international community,therefore,external maintenance of state security and development of its comprehensive strength based on national economy are the two approaches to strengthening the state sovereignty in international relations.The philosophy of free trade for the WTO and the“complex interdependence”of international market contribute a lot to the negative peace between states,and the non-discrimination between“like products”in the WTO legal system helps the states to strengthen their sovereignty.However,the transnational economic activities lead to the global public security crisis,and any state cannot pursue its national security individually.The diplomatic practice of western neo-liberalism results in the development dilemma of the majority of the states,which economically marginalizes most developing countries and weakens their state sovereignty.Against the background of the rise of international populism,this jurisprudential paradox of strengthening of national sovereignty brings about to the paralysis of the appellate body of WTO DSM and nominal existence of generalized system of preferences.In this context,the conception of the Community of Shared Future for Mankind initiated by China will benefit the interaction between the international rule of law and the balanced politics among the great powers,and solve the institutional crisis of the WTO through the substantive equality between the sovereign states.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.97.186