检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕海华 李江[1] Lyu Haihua;Li Jiang(School of Information Management,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China)
出 处:《数据分析与知识发现》2022年第8期12-19,共8页Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery
摘 要:【目的】通过对常识化后免于引用(OBI)现象的发展脉络与研究进展进行评述,重新理解“引用”的本质。【文献范围】以“obliteration by incorporation”、“OBI”、“知识扩散”、“知识老化”等检索词在Web of Science、谷歌学术、中国知网进行检索,筛选出72篇代表性文献。【方法】从知识生产、知识扩散以及知识老化三个方面对OBI现象的现有研究进行梳理和对比分析。【结果】OBI现象的知识贡献与学术价值无法通过引用来体现,因此,“引用”并不能充分体现知识扩散。【局限】对于OBI现象的测度有待进行更深层次的探索。【结论】早在半个世纪前,OBI现象就已经被观察到,但至今仍未引起足够重视。科学计量学界应在OBI现象的基础上重新认识“引用”的本质。[Objective] This paper reviews the development of research on“obliteration by incorporation”, which re-examines the essence of “citation”. [Coverage] We searched “obliteration by incorporation”, “OBI”,“knowledge diffusion”and“knowledge obsolescence”with Web of Science, Google Scholar and CNKI, and retrieved a total of 72 representative literature. [Methods] We examined the phenomenon of“obliteration by incorporation”from the perspectives of knowledge production, knowledge diffusion and knowledge obsolescence.[Results] The knowledge contribution and academic value of the obliteration by incorporation cannot be reflected by citations, which did not adequately reflect knowledge diffusion. [Limitations] More research is needed to explore the measurements of the OBI phenomenon. [Conclusions] The phenomenon of “obliteration by incorporation”was observed half a century ago but did not receive sufficient attention. The scientometrics community should re-examine the essence of citations based on the phenomenon of “obliteration by incorporation”.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7