提取和激活模型下的汉语伪定语句研究  

Chinese fake attributive construction from the perspective of access and activation model

作　　者：许小艳[1] 庞加光[1] Xu Xiaoyan;Pang Jiaguang

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学外国语学院

出　　处：《西安外国语大学学报》2022年第3期6-11,共6页Journal of Xi’an International Studies University

基　　金：陕西省社科基金项目“汉语离合词的认知、句法和功能研究”(项目编号:2020K016)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：汉语伪定语句如“他的老师当得好”通过定中结构“N1的N2”表达经事/角色关系即“他当老师”,打破了自然的句法/语义匹配关系。本文以认知语法提出的提取和激活模型为框架考察“N1的N2”的认知本质与其伪定语解读的动因。本文提出,“N1的N2”是N1、N2的依次提取与激活,并会基于它们的认知关联而形成概念归组。伪定语和定语解读的差异在于两名词的关联方式。与定语解读依靠自身的概念结构来实现这一关联不同,伪定语解读依靠语篇环境激活的常规事件或情景框架,并会涌现出未被直接编码的隐性概念归组,从而形成非典型的形义匹配。在这一视角下,句法结构不具有独立的句法地位,我们无需恪守严格的句法/语义匹配关系。In Chinese fake attributive construction(e.g.,“Tade laoshi dang-de-hao.”)the attributive-head structure“N1 de(的)N2”is interpreted as the experiencer-role relationship(i.e.“Ta dang laoshi”),thus violating the default syntax-semantics match.This paper analyzes the cognitive basis of“N1 de(的)N2”and the motivation underlying the fake attributive reading within the framework of access and activation model proposed by cognitive grammar.It is proposed that“N1 de(的)N2”resides in serially accessing N1 and N2,and hence gives rise to their integration as one grouping on the basis of their cognitive connection.The semantic distinction between attributive and fake attributive readings originates from the different ways to elaborate this connection.As for the attributive reading,its elaboration of this connection hinges on the conceptual structures of the two nominals.By contrast,as for the fake attributive reading,its elaboration depends upon the conventional event or situational frame activated by the particular discursive context,which brings about an unsymbolized conceptual grouping as well as an unconventional form-meaning match.Given that constituency is not postulated as a fundamental syntactic construct from this perspective,there is no justification for a strict syntax-semantics match.

关 键 词：“的”字结构 伪定语句 提取和激活模型 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]