城市空间资源的法律分配——一个司法裁判的视角  

Legal Distribution of Urban Space Resources——A Perspective of Judicial Adjudication

作　　者：刘俊超 朱兵强[1] LIU Junchao;ZHU Bingqiang(Law School,Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081,China)

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学法学院,湖南长沙410081

出　　处：《湖南人文科技学院学报》2022年第5期19-26,共8页Journal of Hunan University of Humanities,Science and Technology

基　　金：国家社科基金重大专项项目“社会主义核心价值观与完善重点领域行政基本法研究”(17VHJ003);湖南省社科基金项目“中外比较视阈下的律师庭外言论规则研究”(17YBA273);湖南省教育厅优秀青年项目“社会主义核心价值观融入司法研究”(18B016)。

摘　　要：随着城市化进程的加快,城市空间资源的需求和供给关系日趋紧张,对以规划许可为主的城市空间资源分配提出了新要求。对于因规划许可引起的相邻关系纠纷,2004年最高人民法院公报案例“念泗三案”确立“达标即合法,合法即不侵权”的裁判思路至今影响着类案的司法处理。相邻权利是规划许可在资源分配中应予保护的公法权利,也是裁判应予保护的公法权利。但“念泗三案”审理思路以技术标准为核心构建的合法性审查,忽略了主观诉讼的权利保护逻辑,因而过度强调许可机关的“高权”地位和相邻权人的服从容忍义务,造成相邻关系间的利益失衡。从行政争议实质化解的角度出发,应当通过区分审理方式、重点审查许可听证笔录、合理确定判决结果以优化类案裁判的理念与思路。With the acceleration of urbanization process,the relation between demand and supply of urban space resources has become increasingly tense,and new requirements have been put forward for the allocation of urban space resources based on planning permission.Regarding disputes over adjacent relations caused by planning permission,the adjudication idea of“reaching the standard is legal,and being legal means non-infringement”established in 2004 by Supreme People’s Court based on“the Niansisan Case”has influenced the judicial handling of similar cases.Adjacent rights are public law rights that should be protected by planning permission in resource allocation,which should be protected by adjudication as well.The legality review based on the technical standards as the core of the trial thinking of“the Niansisan Case”ignores the rights protection logic of subjective litigation,so it overemphasizes the“high power”status of the licensing authority and the obligation of obedience and tolerance of the adjacent rights holders,resulting in imbalance of interests between adjacent relations.From the perspective of substantive resolution of administrative disputes,the idea and thinking of adjudication of similar cases should be optimized by distinguishing the trial methods,focusing on reviewing the transcripts of permission hearings,and reasonably determining the judgment results.

关 键 词：城市空间资源 公法权利 司法裁判 

分 类 号：D922.33[政治法律—法学]