检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李亚南 孙曙生[1] LI Ya-nan;SUN Shu-sheng(Department of Law and Politics,Party School of C.P.C.Jiangsu Committee,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210009,China)
机构地区:[1]中共江苏省委党校法政教研部,江苏南京210009
出 处:《大庆师范学院学报》2022年第5期47-56,共10页Journal of Daqing Normal University
基 金:江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划“提升政府应对突发公共事件能力研究”(KYCX21_3518);江苏省党校系统调研课题“提升政府应对突发公共事件能力研究”(XT2018);江苏省党校系统学习贯彻党的十九届五中全会和省委十三届九次全会精神专项课题“提高应对突发公共卫生事件行政能力研究”(ZX21001)。
摘 要:紧急状态事关国家权力结构的调整和公民基本权利的保障,具有秩序与自由的再平衡、公权力与私权利的再平衡、公民权利与义务再平衡的独特价值功能,必须构建完整有效的紧急状态法律体系。当前,我国紧急状态法律体系面临着相关概念混淆、基本立法缺失、逻辑体系混乱等问题,因此,需要以紧急状态概念在规范层面和事实层面的统一为前提,以国家紧急权力理论为基础,以非常规状态法律体系逻辑的厘清为关键,以《中华人民共和国紧急状态法》的制定为进路,实现我国紧急状态法律体系的有效构建。The state of emergency is related to the adjustment of the national power structure and the protection of the basic rights of citizens. It has the unique value function of re-balancing the value of order and freedom, public power and private rights, and civil rights and obligations. Building a complete and effective emergency legal system is of high request. At present, China’s emergency legal system is facing some problems, such as confusion of related concepts, lack of basic legislation, confusion of logic system, etc. Therefore, it is necessary to realize the effective construction of China’s emergency legal system on the premise of the unification of the concept of "emergency" at the normative level and the factual level, on the basis of the theory of state emergency power, with the clarification of the logic of unconventional legal system as the key, and the enactment of the “Emergency Law of the People’s Republic of China” as the approach.
分 类 号:D911.01[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222