RCEP跨境数据流动规制与中国因应  

RCEP Cross-border Data Flow Regulation and China's Response

作　　者：王燕[1] 刘丹霞 WANG Yan;LIU Danxia

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学

出　　处：《国际法学刊》2022年第3期36-58,154,155,共25页Journal of International Law

基　　金：2021年国家社科基金后期资助项目“数字贸易国际规则研究(21FFXB047)”阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在数字经济飞速发展的时代背景下,跨境数据流动规则成为国家参与全球数据治理的重要内容。不同区域贸易协定更是集中体现了不同数据跨境规制模式。与美欧推进的较为激进的跨境数据流动条款不同的是,RCEP在价值理念上充分尊重各缔约方的实际利益需求,在推进跨境数据流动自由的同时,给予各缔约方充分的政策空间,允许其基于国家安全及公共政策,维持正当的数据本地化措施。中国作为RCEP成员方,其现行《个人信息保护法》《数据安全法》《网络安全法》等应注意与RCEP的对接,建立更具指导性的规则、指南,并渐进提升跨境数据治理的流通性,以适应CPTPP、DEPA更开放的跨境数据流动规则,提升中国在国际数字规则制定中的话语权。Under the background of the rapid development of digital economy,crossborder data flow rules have become an important part of countries'participation in global data governance.Different regional trade agreements embody different data cross-border regulation models.Different from the more radical cross-border data flow provisions promoted by the United States and Europe,RCEP fully respects the actual interests and needs of the parties in terms of values,and while promoting the free flow of cross-borderdata, it gives parties sufficient policy space to maintainlegitimate data localization measures based on national security and public policies.As a member of RCEP, China's current Personal Information Protection Law,Data Security Law and Network Security Law should pay attention to the dockingwith RCEP, establish more instructive rules and guidelines, and gradually enhancethe liquidity of cross-border data governance, so as to adapt to the more opencross-borderdataflowrules of CPTPPand DEPA,and enhanceChina's voice ininternational digital rulemaking.

关 键 词：区域自由贸易协定 跨境数据流动 数据本地化 

分 类 号：D99[政治法律—国际法学] D922.16[政治法律—法学]