检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张颖军[1] 郭新舟 ZHANG Yingjun;GUO Xinzhou
机构地区:[1]中南民族大学法学院
出 处:《国际法学刊》2022年第3期59-92,155,共35页Journal of International Law
摘 要:第三类团体共同犯罪理论是在国际刑事司法审判实践中,由前南斯拉夫国际刑事法庭在塔迪奇案上诉判决中构建,旨在追究大规模战争与武装冲突中,团体共同犯罪成员对其他成员或为推进共同计划而利用的人实施的超出共同计划的罪行承担的责任。由于第三类团体犯罪理论在习惯国际法中地位不明确、部分特设国际刑事法庭的性质不同等原因,该理论没有被后来其他国际刑事审判实践广泛采纳。经过一系列实践,第三类团体共同犯罪理论在国际刑事审判中的作用将逐渐减弱。In the practice of international criminal justice trials,the third category of Joint Criminal Enterprise(Third JCE)was constructed by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in the Appeal Judgment of the Tadic case,aiming to hold members of a group joint criminality responsible for crimes committed by other members or persons used in furtherance of the common plan beyond the common plan in large-scale wars and armed conflicts.From this model of responsibility later in other international criminal trial practice,the Third JCE has not been widely adopted due to its unclear status in customary international law and the nature of some ad hoc international criminal tribunals.After a series of international criminal justice practice,the role of the Third JCE theory in international criminal justice will gradually weaken.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.198.133