近20年国内外高等教育教学质量研究对比——基于CSSCI和SSCI期刊论文的计量分析  

Comparison of Teaching Quality Research of Domestic and Foreign Higher Education in Recent 20 Years:Quantitative Analysis Based on CSSCI and SSCI Journal Papers

作　　者：孙绪光 叶信治[1] SUN Xuguang;YE Xinzhi(School of Education,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350117,China)

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学教育学院,福州350117

出　　处：《鲁东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第5期6-16,共11页Ludong University Journal:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划(教育类)一般课题“‘双一流’建设大学教学和科研协同育人机制研究”(BIA180163)。

摘　　要：基于CNKI数据库和WoS数据库,对2001—2021年间刊发的1505篇CSSCI期刊和1765篇SSCI期刊核心合集中的高等教育教学质量研究论文进行对比分析,得出以下研究结果:高等教育教学质量在国内和国际上均是备受重视的研究领域,但国内和国际研究均没有形成明显的研究共同体;国内和国际研究侧重点不同,国内研究侧重于教学质量保障体系建构、质量文化等,研究视角较为宏观;国外研究则侧重于如何根据教学质量提升教学有效性,研究视角更为微观;在研究方法上,国内研究倾向于理论研究和定性研究,国际研究则更注重基于证据的实证研究、案例研究等。Based on CNKI database and WoS database,a comparative analysis of 1505 CSSCI journal and 1765 SSCI journal core collection teaching quality research papers of higher education published between 2001 and 2021 was carried out.The main research findings are as follows:the teaching quality of higher education is a highly valued research field both domestically and internationally,but neither domestic nor international research has formed an obvious research community;the domestic and international research focus is different with domestic research focusing on the construction of teaching quality assurance system,quality culture,etc.,and the research perspective being relatively macroscopical,and with foreign research focusing on how to improve teaching effectiveness according to teaching quality,and the research perspective being more microscopical;in terms of research methods,domestic research tends to be theoretical and qualitative,while international research pays more attention to evidence-based empirical research and case studies,etc.

关 键 词：教学质量研究 高等教育 比较研究 多维尺度分析 

分 类 号：G649.1[文化科学—高等教育学]