检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏浩翰 WEI Hao-han(School of Training,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
出 处:《赤峰学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2022年第9期59-63,共5页Journal of Chifeng University:Philosophy and Social Science Chinese Edition
摘 要:越权原则是公司治理的基本原则。公司越权对外担保的效力问题是公司法、合同法共同面临的重要问题,理论和实务争议较大,需要立法、司法规制。我国现行法律、司法解释和司法实践确立公司越权对外担保“有效为原则,无效为例外”的效力认定规则,其核心是判断债权人对公司越权担保是否尽到审查责任。债权人构成善意的,担保合同有效,否则担保合同无效。公司章程是债权人审查公司对外担保决议是否合规的基本依据,债权人对公司对外担保决议仅负形式审查义务。Ultra vires doctrine is the basic doctrine in corporate governance.The validity of corporate ultra vires guarantee is an important issue in the fields of company law and contract law,also a controversial issue in theory and in judicial practice,therefore needs regulations in legislation and judicial practice.According to Chinese law,judicial interpretations,and judicial practice,It is an established rule that corporate ultra vires guarantee is legally valid,unless under certain circumstances.The main issue here is to decide whether the creditor has fulfilled its duty of reasonable review.If the creditor is in good faith,the guarantee contract is valid,otherwise invalid.The creditor should review the guarantor's resolution and make sure it is in compliance with the guarantor's articles of association,but only holds liability for formal review.
分 类 号:D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.215.45