论反垄断法实施中的信息分类保护  

Protection of Information by Categories in the Implementation of Anti-monopoly Law

作　　者：剌森 LA Sen

机构地区：[1]北京工商大学法学院

出　　处：《经贸法律评论》2022年第5期40-56,共17页Business and Economic Law Review

基　　金：北京社会科学基金重点项目“网络平台企业横向集中的市场势力及其反竞争行为治理”(项目批准号:21GLA014)。

摘　　要：我国针对反垄断法实施过程中的信息保护制度存在保密规定过于原则化、保密义务主体范围和保密范围过于狭窄、保密程序上缺乏透明的实施细则以及行政执法与民事诉讼衔接不足的问题。不同类别信息的保护与公开需要考量反垄断法实施过程中的不同价值目标,其中主要的价值目标冲突表现为商业秘密、个人隐私和个人信息保护与被调查的经营者申辩权之间的冲突,以及宽大程序中重要证据的保护与后继诉讼中证据获得的需求之间的冲突。首先,基于对不同价值目标的协调,有必要在《反垄断法》中构建框架化的信息分类保护规则,扩展保密义务的主体范围和保密范围,明确保密程序和措施。其次,按照信息在保密程度和保密期限、当事人知情需求上的差异,应当将行政执法程序中不同类型的信息划分为三个类别进行分类保护。最后,有必要在保密的前提下,允许宽大程序中报告与重要证据在后继诉讼中发挥证据价值,并对宽大获得者的民事责任予以适当减轻。As concerning the implementation of the Chinese Anti-monopoly Law, there are four problems:(1) confidentiality provisions are overly principled;(2) the scope of the subject with the confidentiality obligations and the scope of the content of confidentiality are too narrow;(3) lack of transparent implementation rules for confidentiality procedures, and(4) the connection between administrative enforcement and civil litigation is insufficient. The protection and disclosure of different categories of information need to be based on the coordination of different value objectives in the implementation of the Anti-monopoly law, among which the most important value objectives are the conflict between commercial secrets, personal privacy and personal information and the right of defense of the investigated undertakings, as well as the conflict between the protection of important evidences in the leniency procedure and the need to obtain evidences in the follow-on action. Firstly, based on the reconciliation of different value objectives, it is necessary to construct framed rules of protection of information by categories in the Anti-monopoly Law, expanding the scope of subjects with confidentiality obligations and the scope of the content of confidentiality, and clarifying confidentiality procedures and measures.Secondly, in accordance with the differences in the degree and duration of confidentiality and the need to be informed of the parties concerned, different types of information are classified into three categories for the protection in administrative enforcement procedures. Finally, it is necessary to allow the reports and important evidence in the leniency procedure to play evidential value in the follow-on action under the precondition of confidentiality, and to appropriately reduce the civil liability of the leniency recipients.

关 键 词：反垄断法 信息分类保护 宽大制度 个人隐私 个人信息 

分 类 号：D912.294[政治法律—民商法学]