检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马天 能开放 MA Tian;NAI Kai-fang(School of Law,Qinghai Minzu University,Xining 810007,China;School of Military and Political Basic Education,National University of Defense Technology,Changsha 410073,China)
机构地区:[1]青海民族大学法学院,青海西宁810007 [2]国防科技大学军政基础教育学院,湖南长沙410073
出 处:《辽东学院学报(社会科学版)》2022年第4期14-22,共9页Journal of Liaodong University:Social Science Edition
基 金:青海民族大学2022年度校级高层次人才(博士)“领雁”项目“中国海洋安全法律保障问题研究”(2022GCC01);青藏高原环境与资源法学研究基地(国家民委人文社科重点研究基地)2022年基金项目;青海省法学研究所2022年度科研基金资助项目。
摘 要:二战结束后,随着国际海洋法体系的完善,沿海国对海洋安全与权益的愈发重视,海域相向或相邻国家大都依据《联合国海洋法公约》对其所踞之大陆架和200海里专属经济区提出划界主张。中韩两国专属经济区和大陆架在黄海海域存在部分重叠,双方对划界原则和具体方法均存有分歧,故现阶段如何合理运用国际法理论及其规则来维护我国的海洋权益便显得极为重要。值得注意的是,渔业纠纷是当前引发中韩黄海划界争议的一项重要议题,而《中韩渔业协定》是主导这一问题的关键。因此,为了有效应对该协议在实施过程中可能出现的各类问题,并为双方达成最终划界协议提供文本支持,当前有必要对现行的协定内容进行调整和完善。同时,中国在同韩国的划界谈判中应积极利用国际法规定和相关案例的可借鉴性,并做好同韩国方面进行长期性法理斗争的准备。After the end of World War II, with the improvement of the international law of the sea system, coastal countries have paid more attention to maritime security and rights. Most of the countries with opposite or adjacent sea areas have proposed delimitation claims for their continental shelf and 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. There are some overlaps between China and ROK’s exclusive economic zones and continental shelves in the Yellow Sea, and there are differences in the principles and specific methods of demarcation between the two countries. Therefore, how to reasonably use the theory and rules of international law to safeguard China’s marine rights and interests is very important. It is worth noting that fishery disputes are an important issue that has triggered disputes over the delimitation of the Yellow Sea between China and ROK, and that the China-ROK Fisheries Agreement play a leading role in this issue. Therefore, in order to effectively deal with various problems that may arise in the implementation of the agreement and provide textual support for the two parties to reach a final delimitation agreement, it is necessary to adjust and improve the current content of the agreement. Meanwhile, China should actively use the provisions of international law and relevant cases for reference in the demarcation negotiations with ROK, and prepare for a long-term legal struggle with ROK.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38