恢复性司法理念本土化应用的困境与对策——以环境犯罪为例  

Difficulties and countermeasures of the localizedapplication of restorative justice

作　　者：李梁[1] 田玉明 LI Liang;TIAN Yuming(School of Law,Minzu University of China,Beijing 100081,China)

机构地区：[1]中央民族大学法学院,北京100081

出　　处：《周口师范学院学报》2022年第4期105-109,135,共6页Journal of Zhoukou Normal University

基　　金：中央民族大学青年基金项目“生态文明建设与环境刑法改革研究”(2021QNPY61)。

摘　　要：传统刑罚理论通过国家对犯罪人施以刑罚体现正义,却忽视了对受损社会关系的修复。近年来,随着人本主义的发展,恢复性司法理念再度兴起。恢复性司法理念作为治理环境犯罪的新理念,我国多地对其进行实践探索,在此过程中出现了一些不容忽视的问题。在立法上,因立法阙如导致的恢复性措施法律定性不明、适用范围和阶段模糊等问题亟待解决;在司法上,滥用缓刑、执行监督缺位导致恢复性措施效果不佳。为更好使恢复性措施应用于本土化实践中,我国应当尽快对上述问题作出回应。The traditional penalty theory reflects justice through the punishment imposed by the state on criminals,but ignores the repair of damaged social relations.In recent years,with the development of humanism,the concept of restorative justice has sprung up again.As a new concept of environmental crime,restorative justice has been practiced and explored in many places in China.In this process,there are some problems that can not be ignored.In terms of legislation,the legal nature of restorative measures caused by the lack of legislation is unclear,and the scope and stage of application are vague;In judicature,the abuse of probation and the absence of executive supervision lead to the poor effect of restorative measures.In order to better apply restorative measures to localization practice,China should respond to the above problems as soon as possible.

关 键 词：恢复性司法 立法困境 司法困境 完善路径 

分 类 号：D924.36[政治法律—刑法学]