检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学 [2]皖西学院法学院
出 处:《医学与法学》2022年第5期32-35,共4页Medicine and Jurisprudence
基 金:国家社科基金项目“重大疫情背景下公共卫生治理法治化实现路径研究”(项目编号:20XFX009)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:我国对职业病患者权益的保护机制,目前存在诊断机构设置单一、诊断异议渠道狭窄、职业病申请诊断阶段举证责任分配不合理、对职业病患者的救助补偿机制薄弱、与职业病相关的诉讼制度不完善以及工会作用弱化等问题;鉴此,当附条件地扩大职业病诊断机构范围,拓宽职业病诊断异议的救济途径,合理分配职业病申请诊断阶段的举证责任,重构工伤保险制度,将与职业病相关的诉讼纳入公益诉讼范围,增强工会独立性及其作用。In the protection mechanism of the rights and interests of patients with occupational diseases,there are some problems in China,such as single diagnostic organization,narrow diagnosis objection channel,unreasonable distribution of burden of proof in the diagnosis stage of occupational disease application,weak relief and compensation mechanism for patients with occupational diseases,imperfect litigation system related to occupational diseases and the weakening of trade union.In view of this,the scope of occupational disease diagnosis institutions should be expanded conditionally,the relief channels of objections to occupational disease diagnosis should be broadened,the burden of proof should be reasonably allocated in the stage of occupational disease application and diagnosis,the work-related injury insurance system should be reconstructed,the lawsuits related to occupational disease should be included in the scope of public interest litigation,and the independence and role of the trade union should be strengthened.
分 类 号:R132[医药卫生—劳动卫生] D922.54[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.125.111