再论新兴(型)权利的证成标准:对应义务验证说  

A Criteria for Justifying Emerging(New)Rights:Corresponding Obligation Verification Theory

作　　者：贾永健[1,2] JIA Yong-jian

机构地区：[1]河南大学法学院/知识产权学院 [2]河南大学中国史科研流动站

出　　处：《北方法学》2022年第5期42-52,共11页Northern Legal Science

基　　金：2021年国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“新时代党规国法协同推进党的领导法治化研究”(21FFXB053)的研究成果。

摘　　要：权利泛化现象对权利观念的可能危害,要求必须尽快构建科学的新兴(型)权利证成标准。根据权利义务统一性命题,新兴(型)权利必然对应有相应义务。以此为基础的“对应义务验证说”认为,一项权利是否成立可能存在不休争论,但若转化为“该权利所对应义务是否应当成立”,就有可能引导论者超越价值情感纠葛对新兴(型)权利主张是否成立形成较为清晰的内心确证。这更有利于论者进一步认识权利的必然义务成本,从而更为理性和审慎地对待新兴(型)权利主张。As the generalization of rights may be harmful to the concept of rights,it is necessary to construct a reasonable criteria for justifying emerging(new)rights.According to the proposition of the unity of rights and obligations,the emerging(new)rights must correspond to corresponding obligations.Based on this,the“corresponding obligation verification theory”believes that there may be endless debates about whether a right is established,but if it is translated into“whether the corresponding obligation of the right should be established”,it is possible to guide theorists to form a clearer inner confirmation of whether the emerging(new)claim is established beyond the entanglement of value and emotion.This is more conducive to the further understanding of the inevitable obligation costs of rights,and thus to a more rational and prudent approach to the emerging(new)claims.

关 键 词：新兴(型)权利 权利证成 权利义务统一 对应义务验证说 

分 类 号：DF0[政治法律—法学理论]