浅论孙温绘全本《红楼梦》图之优劣  

On the Advantages and Disadvantages of Sun Wen’s Painting of A Dream of Red Mansions

作　　者：夏薇[1] XIA Wei(Institute of Literature,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100732,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院文学研究所,北京100732

出　　处：《吉林师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2022年第5期100-109,共10页Journal Of Jilin Normal University:Humanities & Social Science Edition

摘　　要：通过对孙温绘《红楼梦》图中不能理解的画面、画家删掉的情节和淡化的情节等的研究,发现《红楼梦》图中题图不一致与小说文本“不写之写”有异曲同工之妙;被画家删掉的情节暗示了画家避免复杂的人物冲突的绘画理念,而为了把文本中人物全部笼罩到画中的设想,却使得画作为求全而放弃了细节的独特性和趣味性;画家有意淡化宝黛之情的描绘,连最为关键的“还泪”主题也能抹煞,是画作与文本内涵之间违和的具体体现。人物在画家笔下总是不如景物那么有分量,永远只是中国画中的“点景人物”的用途,而不是重点要讲述的对象。换句话说,画家和作家的不同在于,作家是在讲故事,而画家是用望远镜看有人物点缀的景观。Through the study of the incomprehensible pictures,the deleted plots and the diluted plots in Sun Wen’s A Dream of Red Mansions,it is found that there are similarities and differences between the inconsistent pictures in A Dream of Red Mansions and the“writing without writing”in the novel text.The plot deleted by the painter implies the painter’s painting idea of avoiding complicated character conflicts.In order to cover all the characters in the text in the painting,the painting gives up the uniqueness and interest of the details as a pursuit of perfection.The painter intentionally downplayed the description of feelings between Jia Baoyu and Lin Daiyu.Even the most critical theme of“returning tears”can be erased,which is a concrete manifestation of the conflict between the painting and the text connotation.Characters are always less important than scenery in painters’paintings.They are always just the use of“the landscape decorated with figures”in Chinese paintings,rather than the key objects to be described.In other words,the difference between a painter and a writer is that a writer is telling a story,while a painter uses binoculars to see the landscape decorated with figures.

关 键 词：孙温《红楼梦》图 删掉的情节 淡化的情节 还泪 宝黛 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]