网络平台合同中版权条款:法理分析与规则重构  

Copyright Clauses in Network Platform Contracts:Jurisprudential Analysis and Rule Reconstruction

作　　者：曹雨薇 CAO Yu-wei(School of Law,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学法学院,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《福建金融管理干部学院学报》2022年第3期37-45,共9页Journal of Fujian Institute of Financial Administrators

摘　　要：网络平台合同中的版权条款,在实践中存在诸多热议并被称为霸王条款。一方面,非完全竞争性市场扭曲了合同自愿原则;另一方面,相关版权条款的效力在公平、正义、自由等诸多法律原则中沉浮,其不确定性亟需厘定。为此,在制度层面明确版权法中的合同正义原则,实为对《民法典》中合同自由的矫正机制;在规则层面明确版权归属与版权许可范围及类型、增设版权撤销权等内容,则为对版权合同条款的立法完善;在实践运行层面设立规制平台的特殊机制、引入版权公益诉讼,更能全方位、多角度地兼顾平台与用户的利益。The copyright clause in the online platform contract has many heated discussions in practice and is called the overlord clause. On the one hand, the non-perfectly competitive market distorts the principle of voluntary contract;on the other hand, the validity of relevant copyright clauses fluctuates in many legal principles such as fairness, justice, and freedom, and its uncertainty needs to be determined urgently. To this end, the principle of contract justice in the Copyright Law is clarified at the institutional level, which is actually a correction mechanism for contract freedom in the Civil Code;at the rule level, the ownership of copyright, the scope and type of copyright license, and the addition of copyright revocation rights are clarified. In order to improve the legislation of copyright contract terms;at the practical operation level, the establishment of a special mechanism to regulate the platform and the introduction of copyright public interest litigation can better take into account the interests of the platform and users from all angles.

关 键 词：网络平台合同 版权条款 信息获取权 合同正义 平台资本主义 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学] D923.6[政治法律—法学]