脱逃罪追诉时效问题研究  

Research on the Limitation of Prosecution of the Crime of Escape

作　　者：周鹏 Zhou Peng

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院 [2]中国法治现代化研究院 [3]江苏省监狱管理局狱政管理处

出　　处：《中国应用法学》2022年第5期232-242,共11页China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence

摘　　要：追诉时效的司法适用与学理研究较为混乱,脱逃罪是典型例证。自然意义上,脱逃罪中的“逃”是一种持续不间断的行为;规范意义上,脱逃罪行为人对监管秩序的侵犯并未随时间的流逝而减弱,故宜将脱逃罪认定为继续犯,追诉时效自脱逃行为结束起算。追诉时效的延长属程序问题,应适用“立案说”,而非“强制措施说”。年代久远的案件在认定“立案”与否时可适当放宽标准,以立案登记表复印件等相关证据进行印证。为避免行刑机关继续执行脱逃行为之前未执行完毕刑罚于法无据的情况,公诉机关宜将脱逃罪案件诉至法院,由法院结合具体情况定罪量刑。The judicial application and academic research of the limitation of prosecution are not very clear,and the crime of escape is a typical example.In a natural sense,the"escape"in the crime of escape is a continuous and uninterrupted behavior;in the normative sense,the crime of escape is a violation of the supervision order by a person and has not diminished with the passage of time,so it is appropriate to consider the crime of escape as a continuing crime.The statute of limitations of prosecution starts from the end of the escape.The extension of the statute of limitations of prosecution is a procedural issue,and the"theory of filing a case"rather than the"theory of compulsory measures"should be applied.For remote past cases,the standards can be appropriately relaxed when determining whether to"file a case"or not,and the relevant evidence such as a copy of the case registration form can be used to confirm.In order to avoid the situation where the execution agency continues to execute the escaped punishment before the execution is unfounded,the public prosecution agency should bring the escape crime case to the court,and the court shall convict and sentence it based on the specific circumstances.

关 键 词：脱逃罪 追诉时效 法不溯及既往 立案 强制措施 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]