反思数字化:知识产权法上“修复权”的正当性与制度构建  

Reflection on Digitization:the legitimacy and system construction of“repair right”in intellectual property law

作　　者：马一德[1] 黄运康 MA Yi-de;HUANG Yun-kang(Intellectual Property Research Center,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan Hubei 430073,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《苏州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第5期60-72,共13页Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“新形势下我国参与知识产权全球治理的战略研究”(项目编号:21&ZD164)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：消费品的数字化和产权碎片化已经成为不可逆的浪潮,使“修复权”从消费者的自主权演变成制造商控制消费品售后利用行为的“私权”。知识产权的权利类型和内容扩张是导致“修复权”中心化的根源。“修复权”的中心化带来严重的效率缺失,由此引发资源浪费、环境破坏,以及自由、健康、安全等社会性问题。在新冠疫情背景下,“修复运动”主张“修复权”的传统回归以解决医疗设备的可及性得到国际社会认同,其正当性来源于科技发展对知识产品利用方式的适应。为协调“修复权”与知识产权产生的冲突,一方面应发掘“修复权”去中心化所带来的效率优势,赋予其合法性;此外,在承认知识产权新型权利和内容的前提下引入反垄断法规则,以配合知识产权法规则的运作。The digitization of consumer goods and the fragmentation of property rights have become an irreversible wave,making the“right to repair”evolve from the autonomy of consumers to the“private right”of manufacturers to control the after-sales utilization of consumer goods.The expansion of the types and contents of intellectual property rights is the fundamental cause of the centralization of“right to repair”.The centralization of the“right to repair”brings about a serious lack of efficiency,which leads to the waste of resources,environmental damage,freedom,health,safety,and other social problems.Under the background of COVID-19,the“repair movement”advocates the traditional regression of“right to repair”to solve the problem of accessibility of medical equipment by the international community.Its legitimacy comes from the adaptation of technology development to the utilization of knowledge products.In order to coordinate the conflict between“repair right”and intellectual property rights,on the one hand,we should explore the efficiency advantages brought by the decentralization of“repair right”and give it legitimacy;In addition,on the premise of recognizing the new rights and contents of intellectual property,the rules of antitrust law are introduced to cooperate with the operation of the rules of intellectual property law.

关 键 词：“修复权” 可持续发展 知识产权 反垄断 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]