检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钱玉文 张鹏飞 Qian Yuwen;Zhang Pengfei
机构地区:[1]江南大学法学院 [2]江苏当代国安律师事务所
出 处:《常州大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第5期8-12,共5页Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“金融消费安全的公私合作规制研究”(18BFX138)。
摘 要:我国法院对“人走股留”条款法律效力认识不一,争议焦点集中在资本多数决的适用和企业的人合性两方面。股权转让关涉股东私权利,“人走股留”条款应该基于善意为公司整体利益而为之,主要应从行为人动机和股权转让条款内容两方面进行判断,关注相关价格条款的公平性,最终决定条款效力。The courts in China now hold different attitudes towards the clause of “people leave and shares stay”. They application of capital majority and the human compatibility of the enterprisec are the two main focuses of dispute. The transfer of shares right involves the private rights of shareholders. The clause of “people leave and shares stay” should be based on good faith for the overall interests of the company. It should mainly be judged from two aspects of the actor’s motivation and the content of the equity transfer clause, and pay attention to the fairness of the relevant price clauses to finally determine the effectiveness of the clause.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249