检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘亚兵 刘海港[1] 张波[1] 王冲 LIU Ya-bing;LIU Hai-gang;ZHANG Bo;WANG Chong(AVIC Shenyang Aircraft Design&Research Institute,Shenyang 110030,China)
机构地区:[1]航空工业沈阳飞机设计研究所,辽宁沈阳110030
出 处:《测控技术》2022年第10期26-31,37,共7页Measurement & Control Technology
摘 要:随着机载系统的复杂性、综合化、智能化程度不断提高,故障产生的机理也越来越复杂,传统的自检测、人工检测等手段已经不能满足现代飞机故障诊断和维护的需求。针对传统诊断方法对系统的依赖性和在关联故障模式下处理能力不足的问题,设计了3种综合诊断推理方法,并对3种方法进行了对比分析。重点对基于测试性模型的综合诊断推理方法进行了研究,开发了综合诊断推理机,并组建了仿真验证环境。仿真验证表明该方法诊断结果合理可信。With the increasing complexity,integration and intelligence of airborne system,the mechanism of fault generation is becoming more and more complex.The traditional methods of self and manual detection can not meet the needs of modern aircraft fault diagnosis and maintenance.In order to solve the problem of the dependence of traditional diagnosis methods on the system and the insufficient processing ability under the associated fault mode,three comprehensive diagnosis reasoning design methods are presented and compared.The comprehensive diagnosis reasoning method based on testability model is studied,the comprehensive diagnosis reasoning machine is developed,and the simulation verification environment is established.The simulation results show that the diagnosis results are reasonable and reliable.
关 键 词:机载系统 故障诊断 关联故障 综合诊断推理 测试性模型
分 类 号:V19[航空宇航科学与技术—人机与环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30