检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈志娟[1] 柯昌林[2] CHEN Zhi-juan;KE Chang-lin(Hunan Judicial Police Vocational College,Changsha,Hunan,410131)
机构地区:[1]湖南司法警官职业学院法律系,湖南长沙410131 [2]湖南司法警官职业学院教务处,湖南长沙410131
出 处:《湖南警察学院学报》2022年第3期48-53,共6页Journal of Hunan Police Academy
基 金:2018年湖南省教育厅科研项目“实务中的信任重塑:司法鉴定公信力实证研究”(18C1518)。
摘 要:司法鉴定作为查明案件事实的专门性活动,公信力关系到鉴定意见的质量。司法鉴定公信力困境主要存在于当事人对鉴定意见不信服、法官对鉴定程序过度依赖、舆论存在偏向性评价等方面。之所以存在这些困境,根源就在于当事人的认知、鉴定制度自身的缺陷、法官行为的失范、鉴定意见评价标准不统一等方面。基于此,提升我国司法鉴定公信力,应完善司法鉴定制度、规范法官行为、建立鉴定意见统一评价机制及完善专家证人出庭作证制度。As a specialized activity to ascertain the facts of a case,judicial appraisal has a bearing on the quality of appraisal opinions.There exist some dilemmas at present,for instance,the litigants are not convinced by the appraisal opinions,the judges are excessively reliant on the appraisal procedures,or there are biased evaluation of public opinions.The root lies in the litigants’cognition,the defects of the appraisal system itself,the misconduct of judges,and the inconsistent evaluation standards of appraisal opinions,based on which,it is necessary to enhance the credibility of China’s judicial appraisal by improving the judicial appraisal system,standardizing the judges’behaviors,establishing a unified evaluation mechanism for appraisal opinions,and improving the system for expert witnesses to appear in court.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.220.224.115