化腐朽为神奇:顾颉刚“伪书移置说”的建立及其反响  

The Establishment of Gu Jiegang’s“False Book Relocation Theory”and Its Repercussions

作　　者：汤莹 Tang Ying

机构地区：[1]山东大学马克思主义学院,济南250199

出　　处：《史学月刊》2022年第10期90-98,共9页Journal of Historical Science

基　　金：山东省社会科学规划研究项目“顾颉刚与中国史学的近代转型研究”(21DLSJ02)。

摘　　要：古书考辨是顾颉刚学术的重要组成部分。顾颉刚早在走上“疑古”之路后不久,便初步形成了“移置”的观念,但他正式将这一观念公之于众,则直接缘起于学界对其处理伪书方式的误解。所谓“伪书移置说”,即将“伪书”置于“作伪的时代”,使之成为了解“作伪的时代”的“真书”。顾颉刚之所以能够提出这一建设性的学说,除了自觉接受了欧阳修、胡应麟、梁启超、杨鸿烈、钱玄同等人的“移置”观点外,更在于其以“历史的眼光”与“平等的眼光”对“伪书”进行了审视。因此,此说提出之后,深化了学界对“伪书”的认识,推进了近代古书考辨工作的开展。The textual research of ancient books is an important part of Gu Jiegang’s academic research.The“False Book Relocation Theory”was formed soon after Gu began to have doubts about the ancient history.However,its publicity was directly due to a misunderstanding of his handling of false books by the academia.The theory was to put the false book in the era when it was written,then it could be regarded as a creditable book to understand the era of writing the false books.Gu Jiegang’s capability of putting forward this constructive theory could be attributed to his acceptance of the“relocation”theories of Ouyang Xiu,Hu Yinglin,Liang Qichao,Yang Honglie and Qian Xuantong,and Gu’s examination of false books from the historical and equal perspectives.Therefore,the theory deepened the academia’s understanding of“false books”and promoted the development of modern textual research on ancient books.

关 键 词：顾颉刚 古书考辨 伪书移置说 古史层累说 

分 类 号：K05[历史地理—历史学] K061