检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:凌琪 LING Qi(Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics Nanchang,Jiangxi 330000)
机构地区:[1]江西财经大学,江西南昌330000
出 处:《现代农业研究》2022年第10期141-143,共3页Modern Agriculture Research
摘 要:诉源治理作为新时代“枫桥经验”的具体实践,同时也是做好基层治理工作的法宝。随着社会经济的不断发展,基层农村矛盾纠纷越来越凸显。而由于农村发展水平不够高、治理体系不健全以及存在宗亲关系等因素,其矛盾纠纷也呈现出多元化、复杂化以及群体化和季节化等特征。因此仅通过诉讼途径解决无法对矛盾进行实质性化解,同时也加重了法院“案多人少”的压力。因此探索诉源治理在乡村振兴背景下作为农村矛盾纠纷解决机制的正当性及实现路径具有重要意义。As a concrete practice of "Fengqiao Experience" in the new era, lawsuit source governance is also a magic weapon to do a good job in grassroots governance. With the continuous development of social economy, rural contradictions and disputes at the grass-roots level are becoming more and more prominent. However, due to the low level of rural development,the imperfect governance system and the existence of kinship and other factors, the contradictions and disputes also show the characteristics of diversification, complexity, group and seasonal. Therefore, only through litigation can not solve the contradiction substantively, it also increased the pressure of the court. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore the legitimacy and realization path of litigation source governance as a mechanism for resolving rural conflicts and disputes under the background of rural revitalization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15