检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张法 ZHANG Fa
出 处:《南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学)》2022年第4期104-113,163,共11页Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)
摘 要:中国美学通史的写作,自20世纪80年代以来,呈现为四种类型:教材型、范畴型、关联型、跨越型。前两型主要与中国文化与西方古代-近代的思维模式之互动紧密相关,后两型与中国文化与西方现代-后现代的思维模式有所关联。但这四种类型,都是以范畴为方式和以艺术为中心写成的,这与中国美学史的原貌有所距离。中国美学史写作的新路,应当超越范畴方式和艺术中心,从七个方面展开,以呈现原貌,并以自己的特色参与世界美学的重建。Since 1980s,the writing of the ancient history of Chinese aesthetics has offered four types:those of textbooks,catetories,correletions and interdicsiplines.The first two types are closely related to the interaction between Chinese culture and western ancient-modern thinking mode,while the second two types are related to Chinese culture and western modern-postmodern thinking mode.However,these four types are all presented categorically and artistically,as is distant from the reality of Chinese aesthetic history.The new writing of Chinese aesthetic history should go beyond the old way,and start from seven points to delineate the original historical appearance,so as to have its part in the reconstruction of world aesthetics with its own characteristics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.12.160