从类型学看现代汉语冠词的词类地位  

Articles in Spoken Chinese Revisited:Typological Perspectives

作　　者：罗天华[1] 邓舒文 LUO Tianhua;DENG Shuwen(School of Liberal Arts,Zhejang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学文学院/国家语言文字推广基地,浙江杭州310058

出　　处：《外国语》2022年第4期51-60,共10页Journal of Foreign Languages

基　　金：浙江省社科规划基金项目“语法标注的理论与方法”(22ZJQN06YB);中央高校基本科研业务费项目(S20220087);浙江省教育厅科研项目“现代汉语数量表达的词化现象研究”。

摘　　要：现代汉语有无冠词,学界争议颇多。本文结合冠词的跨语言定义及其与指示词、量词的区分标准,讨论了现代汉语冠词立类的形式、语义和历时依据,认为弱读的“这”和“个”已不用作指示词和量词,而具备了相当的冠词特点,应予单独立类。冠词立类合乎汉语事实,并可避免一些不必要的分析混乱。文章也讨论了相关的“那”和“一”“一个”,认为它们尚未发展为冠词。This paper(re)examines the articles in Spoken Chinese.In the light of cross-linguistic definition of article, it proposes that ge and zhe function as articles in Spoken Chinese in certain contexts.The articles have evolved via a mechanism of tonal change.In particular, ge and zhe no longer function as classifiers or demonstratives in the unstressed neutral tone, which differentiate the classifiers gè and zhè in that the latter ones keep the original high falling tone.It also discusses nà, yī, and yīgè, which are demonstrative, numeral, and classifier, respectively.This study fine-tunes some details in the typological profiles of articles and sheds lights on the classification of parts-of-speech in Mandarin Chinese.

关 键 词：词类 冠词 限定词 指示词 变调 

分 类 号：H13[语言文字—汉语]