检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程跃琳 杨欣 李赛力 黄维 CHENG Yuelin;YANG Xin;LI Saili;HUANG Wei(School of Energy and Power Engineering,Wuhan University of Technology,Wuhan 430063,China;Shanghai Marine Diesel Engine Research Institute,Shanghai 201108,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉理工大学能源与动力工程学院,武汉430063 [2]上海船用柴油机研究所,上海201108
出 处:《柴油机》2022年第4期50-55,共6页Diesel Engine
摘 要:为了研究不同齿轮接触力计算方法对热气机振动响应计算的影响,用多体动力学软件建立其传动系统的刚柔混合多体动力学模型,并通过模态分析验证缩减模型的正确性。分别使用Weber-Banaschek法以及有限元缩减模型的柔性齿轮有限元法进行齿轮时变啮合刚度计算,将不同齿轮时变啮合刚度的热气机整机机脚振动计算值与实测值进行对比,结果表明:采用Weber-Banaschek法计算得到的齿轮啮合刚度误差较大(13.5%);采用有限元缩减模型的柔性齿轮有限元法计算得到的齿轮啮合刚度误差较小(2.1%),其与理论值更接近。In order to study the influence of different gear contact force calculation methods on the vibration response calculation of Stirling engine,a rigid-flexible hybrid multi-body dynamic model of its transmission system was established by multi-boby dynamic software,and the correctness of the model reduction was verified by modal analysis. The Weber-Banaschek method and the flexible gear finite element method of the finite element reduction model were used to calculate the gear time-varying meshing stiffness respectively. The calculated values of the foot vibration of the Stirling engine with different gear time-varying meshing stiffness were compared with the measured values. The results show that:The error of the gear meshing stiffness calculated by the Weber-Banaschek method is larger(13. 5%);The gear meshing stiffness error calculated by the flexible gear finite element method using the finite element reduction model is smaller(2. 1%),which is closer to the theoretical value.
关 键 词:热气机 齿轮 时变啮合刚度 多体动力学 振动响应计算
分 类 号:U664.124[交通运输工程—船舶及航道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.151