行游走旅·云笺论道——“旅游与行走”主题学者对话录  

A Written Dialogue on Touring and Walking

作　　者：黄旭 郭文[2] 朱璇[3] 张进福[4] 张骁鸣[5] Huang Xu;Guo Wen;Zhu Xuan;Zhang Jinfu;Zhang Xiaoming(Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China;Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing 210095,China;Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China;Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,China;Sun Yat sen University,Zhuhai 510275,China)

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学 [2]南京农业大学 [3]上海师范大学 [4]厦门大学 [5]中山大学

出　　处：《旅游论坛》2022年第4期1-16,共16页Tourism Forum

基　　金：国家自然科学基金面上项目《流动性背景下传统村落神圣空间的地方性生产与不平衡地理研究(2020-2023)》(批准号41971186);国家自然科学基金面上项目《移动性视角下背包旅行者的时空差异及其作用机制(2021-2024)》(批准号42071177);国家自然科学基金面上项目《融合媒介环境学视角的日常生活空间体验研究(2022-2025)》(批准号42171221);国家社会科学基金一般项目《拉萨流动人口问题研究(2021-2024)》(批准号21BSH150);教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目《心理学与地理学交叉研究:地方感的心象运动理论(2021-2024)》(批准号21YJAZH030)等基金课题的大力资助。

摘　　要：孔子周游列国,留下广为传布的身形就是“孔子行教像”,此掌故中除了并举“游”“行”,更将二者同归旨于“教”,不免令依然在孜孜探问旅游之本质、旅游之意义的当代学人心头一热。这一期学者对话,我们有幸邀请到南京师范大学黄旭副教授、南京农业大学郭文教授、上海师范大学朱璇教授、厦门大学张进福副教授、中山大学张骁鸣教授等5位学者,以旅游研究中的“行走”概念为线索,面对随着时代发展内涵不断演变的行走现象,细论“旅游与行走”的因缘脉络,谈论的议题总共有4个:有关“行走”的学术概念、个人相关研究取向、对以行走为基本形式的微旅游现象的理解以及“行走”的学术思考的公众传播。按照最初活动方案,5位学者是准备以围坐恳谈的方式或者以“逍遥散步(promenade)”的方式展开交流,但由于疫情防控需要,不得已换用由一人提问、4人背对背各自作答的“笔端对话”,然后举行线上会议详加讨论,最后完成文稿整合的“笔端+云端”方式结束本次对话。对5位与谈人而言,这一形式新鲜有趣,既有书写的严谨,又有道说的灵动;对我们而言,既是一次编辑风格上的大胆尝试,也是一次对于所有思考者、分享者的诚恳致敬和盛情邀请。最后,需要说明的两点是:第一,本次对话活动相关工作得到了国家自然科学基金面上项目《流动性背景下传统村落神圣空间的地方性生产与不平衡地理研究(2020-2023)》(批准号41971186)、国家自然科学基金面上项目《移动性视角下背包旅行者的时空差异及其作用机制(2021-2024)》(批准号42071177)、国家自然科学基金面上项目《融合媒介环境学视角的日常生活空间体验研究(2022-2025)》(批准号42171221)、国家社会科学基金一般项目《拉萨流动人口问题研究(2021-2024)》(批准号21BSH150)、教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目This written dialogue among five invited scholars was around the term“walking”in the context of tourism research.Their series of talks were about four topics grounded in the evolving facts of walking:the academic concept of“walking”,their preferences of research,the understanding of the walking-based micro-tourism phenomenon,and the communication of this academic idea on the public.Various disciplinary perspectives,research approaches and cognitive dimensions were encountering on this written dialogue,sparking the fire of wisdom and mind.It was first reflected on the difference between the two disciplines,tourism and geography.Tourism scholars assumed“walking”as a way of traveling and tried to excavate and conclude the phenomenon and characteristics of walking at different levels and situations;while the concept of walking from the lens of geographers could be seen as a combination of means,purpose,process,and outcome.In their research,the evolution of desire and the spatial paradox behind the phenomenon of walking tended to be grasped along the theoretical clue.This difference also happened in the case of research background.Academic research had two different sources:one was from the profound personal experience;the other was from the philosophical mind activated by extensive humanistic observations.Moreover,the multiple research dimensions were manifested in the dialogue between individual vs.society,extreme vs.common,and inward vs.outward:for the research scopes,it was necessary to interpret walking as both an individual action and a composite of social processes;for the research objects,both minority at both polars of the walking/non-walking spectrum and majority along the axis of the spectrum were taken into consideration;for the research significance,it emphasized the adherence to academic independence,but also appreciated the enthusiasm for speaking to the public.

关 键 词：国家社会科学基金 对话活动 媒介环境学 新鲜有趣 基金课题 公众传播 思考者 盛情邀请 

分 类 号：F592[经济管理—旅游管理]