检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴林晔 阮佳音 Wu Linye;Ruan Jiayin(Medical Care Ward,Zhejiang Hospital,Hangzhou 310030,China;School of Nursing,The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,Hong Kong 000000,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江医院医疗照护病房,杭州310030 [2]香港理工大学护理学院,中国香港000000
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2022年第28期3979-3984,共6页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
摘 要:在我国质性研究尤其是现象学研究方法不断发展的背景下,近年来,解释现象学分析(IPA)逐渐得到护理同仁的关注,虽已有初步实践,但也呈现出一些有待改进的问题,如对IPA理解存在偏差、研究过程不够严谨与研究报道不够透明、分析结果质量欠佳、原始资料证据不够充足等。对此,本文拟在剖析IPA应用现状及存在问题的基础上,提供理论知识及可借鉴的学习案例,以期提高我国护理人员对IPA理论知识与实践方法的认识,促进该方法在我国护理领域的合理运用与积极发展。As the constant development of qualitative research in China,especially phenomenology,interpretative phenomenological analysis(IPA)has gained some attention among nursing staff in recent years.Although there has been some preliminary practice,several issues also emerge,including misunderstanding of IPA,research progress not rigorous enough and research reporting not transparent enough,low quality of data analysis,and insufficient raw data to support.Therefore,this study aims to analyze the current situation and existing problems of the application of IPA,and provide learning cases and theoretical knowledge for reference,so as to enhance the understanding of IPA and research process among Chinese nursing staffs.Besides,this study will also promote the positive development and appropriate practice of IPA in nursing filed in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170