东周青铜器自名与传世文献方言词互证研究  

A Study on the Mutual Evidence between the Self-name of Bronze in the Eastern Zhou Period and Dialect Word in Handed down Document

作　　者：王英霄 Wang Yingxiao(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Beijing Language and Culture University,Beijing 100089,China)

机构地区：[1]北京语言大学文学院,北京100089

出　　处：《现代语文》2022年第10期4-10,共7页Modern Chinese

基　　金：北京语言大学研究生创新基金项目(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金)“商周青铜器器物自名的地域特征研究”(22YCX117)。

摘　　要：方言材料在先秦出土文献研究中发挥着重要作用,利用方言材料可以辅助考释古文字,同时,古文字也可以为方言材料提供佐证,二者能够达到材料上的互证。在东周青铜器自名中,与传世文献方言词所在地域相一致的,有“■”“散”“■”“句孑戟”“㼤”“甾”“筲”等;不一致的,有“餥”“盌”“瓮”;部分一致的,有“刘”;“铍”“盎”“键”由于所属文化区不能确定,与传世文献记载的方言词所在地域是否一致,还有待进一步探究。Dialect material play an important role in the unearthed document in the Pre-Qin period.The use of dialect material can assist in the interpretation of ancient character.At the same time,ancient character can provide evidence for dialect material,and the two can achieve mutual reference in material.Among the self-name of the Eastern Zhou bronzes,words that are consistent with the dialect areas of the handed down literature dialect words are“dān(■)”“sǎn(散)”“zhēng(■)”“gōujiéjī(句孑戟)”“qi(㼤)”“zī(甾)”“shāo(筲)”,etc;Inconsistencies,such as“fēi(餥)”,“wǎn(盌)”and“wèng(瓮)”;Partially consistent,such as“liú(刘)”;The cultural regions of“pī(铍)”“àng(盎)”and“jiàn(键)”are not clear,whether they are consistent with the dialect regions of the dialect words recorded in handed down documents remain to be further proved.

关 键 词：青铜器自名 方言词 东周时期 出土文献 传世文献 

分 类 号：H171[语言文字—汉语] H121[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学] K877[历史地理—历史学]