检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董杨 周志忍[3] 李梓钧 Dong Yang;Zhou Zhiren;Li Zijun(School of Public Management,Liaoning University,Shenyang 110036;School of Government,Peking University,Beijing 100871)
机构地区:[1]辽宁大学公共管理学院,沈阳110036 [2]北京大学政府绩效评估中心 [3]北京大学政府管理学院,北京100871
出 处:《中国行政管理》2022年第9期67-73,79,共8页Chinese Public Administration
基 金:国家社科基金青年项目“基于公共责任视角的政府购买公共服务绩效评估研究”(编号:18CZZ033);辽宁省经济社会发展研究项目“政策反馈视角下辽宁政府购买服务促进社会组织发展研究”(编号:20231s1qnkt-039)。
摘 要:作为一种有效的监控机制和责任机制,绩效评估一直是我国政府购买公共服务的重要组成部分。它旨在为公共项目和组织绩效提供各种客观信息,这些信息可以用来强化管理并为决策提供依据。然而,实践中评估主体的专业化程度不高、价值取向偏差,以及绩效评估制度缺失等一系列问题,弱化了政府购买公共服务绩效评估的实际效用,易导致公共责任赤字。公共责任赤字广义上是指公共责任机制表现出的不足及削弱公共责任相关价值的任何方面,具体表现为:信息阶段的绩效信息基础缺乏阻碍了公共责任的履行;评估阶段的科学评估困境使公共责任履行不到位;结果阶段的结果应用有限不利于公共责任的约束与改善。通过建立完善的信息公开制度、公民参与制度、绩效反馈制度等治理措施,可以优化绩效评估体系及公共责任履行,有针对性地减少公共责任赤字。As an effective monitoring mechanism and accountability mechanism,performance evaluation has always been an important part of the government’s purchase of public services.It is designed to provide a variety of objective information on public programs and organizational performance that can be used to strengthen management and inform decision-making.However,in practice,there are a series of problems such as low degree of specialization of evaluation subjects,deviation of value orientation and lack of supporting system,which weakens the actual utility of the performance evaluation of government procurement of public services and easily leads to the public accountability deficit.In a broad sense,public accountability deficit refers to the deficiencies of the public accountability mechanism and any aspect that weakens the relevant value of public accountability.In this case,the specific manifestations are:the lack of performance information foundation in the information phase hinders the performance of public accountability;the dilemma of scientific evaluation in the evaluation phase makes the public accountability not fulfilled in place;the limited application of results is not conducive to the restraint and improvement of public accountability.By establishing a sound information disclosure mechanism,citizen participation system,performance feedback mechanism and other governance measures,we try to provide some references for optimizing the performance evaluation system and its public accountability fulfillment,so as to reduce the public accountability deficit in a targeted manner.
关 键 词:公共责任赤字 政府购买公共服务绩效评估 公共责任机制
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38