检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘杨 胡聪沛 LIU Yang;HU Cong-pei(Shanghai Institute of Justice,Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701,China;Law School&Intellectual Property School,Jinan University,Guangzhou 510632,Guangdong China)
机构地区:[1]上海政法学院上海司法研究所,上海201701 [2]暨南大学法学院/知识产权学院,广东广州510632
出 处:《北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2022年第4期95-103,共9页Journal of Beijing Union University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“现代诠释学视域下的法律原则研究”(项目编号:21AFX003)。
摘 要:规范性法律文件名称和发布方式的规范化,是规范性法律文件规范化的核心内容。长期以来,我国规范性法律文件名称纷繁杂乱、名实不符,或构成要素不规范;其发布方式或缺少必要的形式,或种类混乱,或格式不一。这些不规范现象都不是关于法律“门面”的小节,而是关涉法律尊严的大事,最终影响法律的权威和公信力,在建设法治中国、全面依法治国的今天,尤其应当引起重视。法律名称的规范化既要考虑其构成要素的普遍性,也要顾及各类法源的特殊性,通过相关立法规范加以统一。规范性法律文件的发布方式,也需要借助完善相关立法规范,解决发布令(或公告)缺失或格式混乱、发布方式种类混乱、修订后法律的发布方式尤其不规范等问题。将规范性法律文件名称和发布方式上的规范化问题,上升到立法尊严的高度去认识和对待,有助于走出规范化工作长期难以取得实质性进展的误区。Normalization of the legal name and publication method is the central element of the standardization of normative legal documents. Over a long period of time, the name of China’s normative legal documents are complicated and confusing, the name does not match the reality, or the composition is not normalized. Its publication method lacks the necessary form, or may be confusing in type or format. All of these irregularities are not about the legal “facade” of the subsection, but about the dignity of the law, and ultimately affect the authority and credibility of the law. In the construction of the rule of law in China, the comprehensive rule of law today should be given special attention. The normalization of legal names should not only consider the universality of their constituent elements, but also take into account the specificity of various legal sources and unify them through relevant “legislative norms.” The publication method of normative legal documents needs to be resolved with the help of improving the relevant legislative norms, the lack of publication orders(or announcements) or confusion in format, confusion in the types of publication methods, and the irregularity of publication method of revised laws. To raise the issue of normalization of the name of normative legal documents and the way of issuing them to the height of legislative dignity will certainly be a way to get out of the misunderstanding in normalization work for a such long time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7